Thanks@ vonguyenkhang
I will do the test. Its seems like the AVs chang every in the Top of 10.
The manufacture compare i will not full believe cause every manfuactor say his one is the best.
Im gona unistall symantec enterprice solution corporate av (not norton AV 200x homeuserequiplements) cl + svr in test envoimence and try tis one.
Thanks a lot.

What? (NUKED)????-ESET please explane if its importand. ->@zeEND

Can I trust in it? When i uninstall the the AV we use now on svr. + client on a few wks? Will it work some one have test it first please? Updates working everytime available?

Thanks. Lets see after a few days test how about this av.

Anyone have the admin version???

I need patches only.
Without progy.
Who will send?

Anyone have the admin version???

thanx

is multilanguage?

This neez 2b researchd if this good thing can speaka my language 2me.

I keep getting the trial version downloaded after i go 'full product' with the usernames.
any ideas why that is?

What's the difference between the NOD32 Trial Fix 2.1 and these 4 patches?

Thanks for the swift replies all!
This may sound a little dumb, so I appologise in advance, but, am I missing out on anything using the 45,797yr trial over the Full version? I'm guessing not as the trial still gets the definitions. Maybe i'm missing something here . . . sorry!

As far as I know, the only difference is the update servers you are directed to, for updates. After upgrading to the full version, the program will add some new default servers to the "server" list. When the program causes a reversion to trial, the new default servers stay in the list. :-)

In the Admin version you do get a mirror button under "update", but as long as it updates, what's the difference.

My NOD32 v2.51.26 is working good, including the updating process.So what is the different between V2.51.26 abd V2.51.30. I want to try but somebody please gimme some explanation??

Virus Devs wont update or is signature from 27. July the latest?

2. Anyone help with my error message "Error occurred while scanning MBR sector of the 2. physical disk. Error reading sector."

Seems like my 2nd MBR is the result of the long startup of windows time delay.

Fix MBR using file from dos and command? was what?

After a while pushing update it seems it catched the right server even when it shows before latest sigs etc. are present. u8.eset.com seems to be the rigth update server 4me

virus singature 20060805 = 05.Aug 2006

correction some archives in archives it seems to have trouble while scaning 4 example tgz.>> tar while Wise installer, etc. can look inside very well

small troubles extracting from upx exe packer dll's by scanning, splittet rar archives inside zip files or splittet zips insite rar files doing scann seekeng for missing 2nd etc. volumen. Overall most possibile archiving methodes are known by deliver viruses inside of xyx.archives.

not to alarm you guys but this isnt new. it was posted about 2 weeks ago.

Dear MinhHuy please help can you upped to any other file host for me cause rapid as always says my ip is downloading 24/h a day. We sit on shared IPs here in this country.

That's correct ! Download link 100% working ! Come on come and let's it show !

Please anyone put Portable_NOD32_Antivirus_System_v2.51.28_for_ALL_Windows.rar on any other filesharehost than rapidsh cause I have shared ip i can not download it. All proxys are testet no way to get it under.

Here is the direct link. Hungry up

http://dl37cg.rapidshare.de/files/28473354/2565014938/Portable_NOD32_Antivirus_System_v2.51.28_for_ALL_Windows.rar

Thanks

anyway to put from the fullversion if it have more update server in list. The serverlist from it in this NOD32???

ps_upd.dll possible file for it.

Yu can file ít on google. Each PC have difference dll file

k thanks. server list seems to be somehow included.

sorry found it in cr.

whats the profit of getting NOD32 2.51.30 as a registered version. between ESET NOD32 v2.51.30 For WinNT/2000/2003/XP + BRD excellent Patched one?

can you QQ244890919 me pls?

It can be very wrong but in the moment when the people install an antivirus new the same existand on will not monitor. the trick with wininit and co when windows reboot to inject systemfiles in the time before any antivirus is startet cause windows isnt start up by booting.
3. Install NOD32 FiX v2.1 exe and follow instructions

4. Go to the installation folder of NOD32, usually C:\Program Files\Eset, you will see nod32fix.reg (It's a registry entry for NOD32). Click nod32fix.reg. It will ask you whether u wanna add the entry, just click on yes then click on OK.

Says my allerts that nodfix alials freeme does patch winlogon. Is winlogon needed to be patched to get the av registered cause its self will after injection not check that winlogon inizialization is not more the same as it should be or we are in touch with it?

fellowed friends be carefull i have a bad feeling if winlogon and wininit or any startup mods come in progress by a patch. Better download only from the topic top the original download from 9down and thanks with a bannerclick.

And will you tell us James Dean witch marketting company have a use from the winuserlogon injection with this spyware when the av is patched and do not more allert it?
I dont thing that by the versions before patch NOD32 FiX v2.1 alias freeme was really done it. otherwise the patch will be in the release on top not only here somehow in the comments to be published. Your input is recommended to explain what the freeme nod fix do if other systems monitor it does changes in winlogon user initialization. We all have the button to make it undo. Just the reg file is not in the place as it should. Whats next wininit entry maybe? Greatings from Taiwan.

RE-CON , in a sentence or two , are you saying his .reg file is laiden with spyware?

no freeme.exe dont u see when u execute alias NOD32 FiX v2.x what it doeas. I dont think that winlogon progress system files userlogon needs to be patched for the av. when u have allready done the step until the reg file is in the directory its allready patched. Hope u have a backup.

i didnt trace it now so a detail log i do not have it neez to unpe the nodfix alias freeme and inspect it.
Spyware check:
15:32:54 Winlogon-Userinit Isolieren Systemobjekt
15:32:47 Winlogon-Userinit Objekte gefunden Systemobjekt
15:32:47 Winlogon-Userinit Objekte gefunden Systemobjekt
15:22:31 Winlogon-Userinit Isolieren Systemobjekt
15:22:10 Winlogon-Userinit Objekte gefunden Systemobjekt
Why freeme.exe alias nod32 fix does that? I do not understand what Winlogon-Userlogon have to do to need to be patched.

even if the allert of spyware is wrong on all other protections why then freeme.exe alial nodfix touch winlogon prozess? This facts are clear as soon executing and apply the freeme.exe = nod32 fix. Not my business at all. BRD patch work and is save and do not any "unwantet" activities.

Hello guys! Is the Nod32 better than kaspersky?? Please help! thx!!!

and voila its reged!

NOD32 antivirus system information
Virus signature database version: 1.1694 (20060805)
Dated: Saturday, August 05, 2006
Virus signature database build: 7803

Information on other scanner support parts
Advanced heuristics module version: 1.034 (20060805)
Advanced heuristics module build: 1119
Internet filter version: 1.001 (20031104)
Internet filter build: 1012
Archive support module version: 1.048 (20060714)
Archive support module build version: 1173

Information about installed components
NOD32 for Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/x64 - Base
Version: 2.51.30
NOD32 for Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/x64 - Internet support
Version: 2.51.30
NOD32 for Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/x64 - Standard component
Version: 2.51.30

cel mai bun antivirus :) the best

chai:)

Anyone asure knows if the nod32 is better than Kaspersky?

I do not know cause kaspersky have since last year a heavy bug withc can together with scandisk crash the hdd filestructure (read the manufacture forum and support faq issues).

NOD32 is better than Kaspersky.

Kaspersky scans faster has hourly updates and is a more complete product, but NOD32 has a better scanning engine/system and uses less system resources.

Kaspersky was good, than They crapped it up, and I moved to Nod32, they say they fixed Kaspersky in ver 6, I say ok, but I'll tryit when final version comes out, not crappy beta, anyway, Avast is also good

I used both kaspersky and NOD32 for over a year, Kaspersky scans faster and updates more. NOD32 often found things that Kaspersky did not and uses less system resources. The one thing NOD32 could use is a firewall or internet suite.

great!!

Kaspersky?

If you have not found out already,
It uses so much resources, that it will eventually
"CRASH" your system!!!
But, is it good?
YES!

All of the patches you listed work NOD32 FiX v2.1, nod32fix_V2.2, nod32fix_V2.3 and the BRD four patches. I have been using the BRD four patches for a few days now and this patch version seems to be the least problematic.

Although unnecessary, I was able to upgrade to full version using a User Name and Password and so far the Password has not been blacklisted. I don’t know if that has anything to do with the BRD patches, but when using the other patches, the program would reset to “Trial” (with 45,000 years until expiration) upon each Virus Definitions Update.

Reading the post from gag, nine back, I used the backup file to remove the nod32krn.exe patch(#4). After removing this patch, the program reverted to a thirty day trial. The BRD patch # 4 is more than likely needed for the proper patching of NOD32. Perhaps, the program needs to be completely reinstalled to do this, but I am frankly tired of messing with NOD32.

Anyone have the admin version???

To 6uldmn: Please post latest admin version (2.51.30)

Thanx in advance

In other words, post Nod32 2.51.30 for XP-2K with mirror function (admin version)

To 6uldmn: Please post latest admin version (2.51.30)

Thanx in advance

In other words, post Nod32 2.51.30 for XP-2K with mirror function (admin version)

Sorry, as far as I know, v 2.51.26 is the newest admin. version.

OK. Thanx

The BRD patches are not just "cut and paste" patches. Each patch must be double clicked, or opened and then applied. If you did that, the BRD patches may not work with the Portuguese Version.

Username = AV-2966510
Password = 5nni4qo39e

hi
I am using & test nod32 2.5 , mcafee , symantec , kaspersky 6.00 , avast ,bitdifender 9 ,...

nod32 is best...

becauase
you have fast start up windows &
you can update very fast &
scan pc very good

Have nice they for you

NOD32

The nod32 antivirus is divided into four part
1) NOD32 is a complete on demand and on schedule scanner
2) AMON is a real time scanner that checks files on access
3) DMON protects the system from viruses contained in various documents such as macro viruses in microsoft word document
4) IMON scans incoming POP3 and HTTP streams protecting you from web and e-mail threats

NOD32 protects against all kind of malicious codes viruses, torjans, worms, spyware , adware.

advantage:- very light on system; excellent heuristic engine; frequent virus defination updates in small packages.

disadvantage:- no integrated firewall; interface aimed at advance users

NOD32

The nod32 antivirus is divided into four part
1) NOD32 is a complete on demand and on schedule scanner
2) AMON is a real time scanner that checks files on access
3) DMON protects the system from viruses contained in various documents such as macro viruses in microsoft word document
4) IMON scans incoming POP3 and HTTP streams protecting you from web and e-mail threats

NOD32 protects against all kind of malicious codes viruses, torjans, worms, spyware , adware.

advantage:- very light on system; excellent heuristic engine; frequent virus defination updates in small packages.

disadvantage:- no integrated firewall; interface aimed at advance users

lack of firewall can be considered a drawback but the heuristic system in NOD32 is one of the best according to the survey . even though virus defination updates keep on coming at almost a daily basis, the heuristic system alone can block out any malicious software thats about to act up, making it valuable antivirus even when its not completly patched up to existing standards. One feature that most advanced users enjoy is its advanced tweaking capablities. how ever casual urers may turn it off. and even while playing games there isnt pin drop in system resourse

Username = AV-2946081 Password = ag191a4d43

Karspersky it is ....

please, I'am Brazilian
I need code

Hi

Username = AV-3854921
Password = 198rqgbd3h

enjoy it!

Username = AV-3829173 Password = 08kdsqfc6g

Would tell me if this version of NOD32, simply the best of the best anti virus, works with Windows Vista?

yup suddenly all links was dead... reported and kill...
NOD32 or KASPERSKY is both good software than norton... stop the war like this...
use what software as u like ....no point for that reporting....

the perfect computer for Kaspersky to run on:

Pentium 4, overclocked to 4.0Ghz
2 GB RAM
20 (yes twenty) GB hard drive
liquid cooling to keep it all stable

see, with that processor speed and that much RAM, your computer would actually be able to handle KAV without slowing down. and with a hard drive that small, you might not even fall asleep waiting for KAV to stop scanning!

Regret, unable to post. In between it is meganet dot lt.

Enjoy!

15-25 August 2006 (NEW!!!)

Rank:

1. Kaspersky version 6.0.0.303 - 99.62%

2. Active Virus Shield by AOL version 6.0.0.299 - 99.62%

3. F-Secure 2006 version 6.12.90 - 96.86%

4. BitDefender Professional version 9 - 96.63%

5. CyberScrub version 1.0 - 95.98%

6. eScan version 8.0.671.1 - 95.82%

7. BitDefender freeware version 8.0.202 - 95.57%

8. BullGuard version 6.1 - 95.57%

9. AntiVir Premium version 7.01.01.02 - 95.45%

10. Nod32 version 2.51.30 - 95.14%

P.S. The 147184 virus samples were chosen using VS2000 according to Kaspersky, F-Prot, Nod32, Dr.Web, BitDefender and McAfee antivirus programs. Each virus sample was unique by virus name, meaning that AT LEAST 1 antivirus program detected it as a new virus.

Heuristics-only detection

What are heuristics: They analyze the code of each file with generic methods and detect new viruses that have not yet been included in the virus database of the antivirus software.

1 Nod32 2.51.30 - 41503
2 Vba32 3.11.0 - 32911
3 VirIT 6.1.9 - 16469
4 AVG 7.1.405 Professional - 13624
5 AVG 7.1.405 freeware - 13624
6 Rising AV 18.41.30 - 12214
7 McAfee 10.0.27 - 10708
8 Ikarus 5.19 - 7191
9 F-Prot 6.0.4.3 beta - 6247
10 Ukrainian National Antivirus 1.83 - 5506

Ugadugu.. If u really think Crappersky is better than NOD 32 Shove it up yur Ass bich.. Stick ur Fukd up posts in Kaspersky threads.. Not here u stupid noob.. So jus get the hell outta here or am gonna bite ur balls off..

Guys.. Trust me.. NOD 32 Roxx..:) Its any day betta than Kaspersky and this version which is valid lifelong..

Jus get the fukk outta here u stupid son of a **[ 9down.com refused this word ]**.. Yu can come kiss my ass **[ 9down.com refused this word ]**.. U stinky slimy yucky dirty piece of Kaspersky crap.. Why dont u Try remove a few of ur ribs so that u could suck on ur dick u fickle headed dick head..

All u can do is Cup copy paste some Shit.. Stupid noob fukk.. lol..

If anyone is having trouble getting NOD32, Find me and I can get you to it.

Hmmm.. nOD 32 really good n low on resources.. All nod users please do something about this Cock sucker uGAUDU..

Hello! Hogy kell letölteni?

noooooooooooo... the patches work fine which given ere.. BRD..!!!! Nod is king of kings!!!

Mr 9down.. Please Ban ugadou frm this forum..

please view a live link to download patch !
Thanks

Dude.. I accept Kaspersky is good.. Nod 32 is good as well .. SO why doncha understand buddy...

Okie.. Peace Bro..!!!:)

Hey guys I need an antivirus to Windows Vista. The one that works is AVG. I've tried Nod32 and Norton and they didnt work.

Nod32 is simply the best.. I am using the insane fix by NOD.. Its working great.. U still remail in trial version but u still have some 45thsnd years remaining..:)

kaspersky is also equally good..

some one please send my the patch............................................. I am waiting here..........

some one please send me the patch................ I am waiting here..........

please help meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Runnungfool, s7en and others:You people really dosent know much about NOD and KAV/KIS eh??
NOD 32 is a GREAT AV,but it dosent hold a candle against KAV and KIS 6.
Let me tell you why.Kaspersky 6 have a lil thing,calleed the proactive module.That include something called a registerguard and actitivityanalyzer,so when some dirty little shit spy or virus thing try to enter your machine,KAV and KIS hit the brakes,and ask you with a pop up "is this okay with you"?!NOD is NOT capabale of doing that,ok?
Please stop the BS that NOD is better than KAV/KIS 6.NOD is a really great AV,that dosent use much resourses,but to compare it with Kaspersky 6 is like comparing apples and oranges.
End of story!Kaspesky 6 IS the best protection at the moment.Its a fact.
Thanks 9 down,you are the best.

NAJDOBAR

thank

the Username Password to get the upgrade to full version is no longer good can anyone help?thanks

thanks

GGGG

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6. But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately.
The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses.
What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

Good one!

thanks a lot dear..........