WTF is this??!
AV company making admin tool?!
instead of working on their response time or their malware removal success rate they come out with this BS??!!

Included NOD32 Av or ESET Security ?

I love ESET :)

Guy, ESET is a softwares company.
u LOVE a softwares company?
even if u work for them i think is very strange that u LOVE them.
duuude, u need to find a nice chick!

That asshole needs to go out and meet real woman ,that stay in front of his computer installing software and palying with dick.

LOL!!

Some folks are just assholes about anything. Grief. Get a life partner.

NOD32King, dre360 & HayRaker, are u all mentally retarded? U think gigabyte89 was serious? Get some braincells and them come back and type something useful.

Nice program even though there's not much to do with it. But it's kinda useful. Keeper for now.

LOL... Well answered, throwed right back to their face!
wahaha

TARANE AI CITIT CE TIAM SCRIS LA KASPERSKY????????

SI APROPO TARANE ESTI SINGURU BOU DE PE SITEUL ASTA CARE SUGE PULA LUI NOD32 DE PARCA IAR DA AIA DE MINCARE TIRTANE NUMAI TU TE PISI CONTRA VINTULUI NU VEZI CA ESTI DE CICAT SINGURU CARE PUPA IN CUR NODU32 DE PARCA INTERESEAZA PE CINEVA CA STI TU CA E MAI BUN DE CIT KAV TIRTAN DE CICAT CARE INJURI DE MAMA LACHE FLAUSAT CACATE PE EL DE NOD SI FA SI PE TINE CA NU SE SUPARA NIMENI SI TIRTANE ZIMI DE UNDE ESTI SA VIN SATI RUP MCAPU ALA PROST DE HACHER DE CICAT CE ESTI

N fuk u

ESTI O LABA TRISTA, MANCA MI AI CACATU!
FUTUS PIZDA MASI, SUGI PULA SI CU CURU SI CU GURA!!
FUTUI PIZDA MATI CAPAC!!

lol.. NOD32King I think it's u who r retarted here, I just mean by that i love ESET products.. like Nod32 which I appreciated

Ph well looking at assholes like NOD32King & Co, i think i will switch to the stable Kaspersky!

NOD32King stop bashing between kaspersky or eset & get a life..

hahaha

and well said Jack_Bauer!

Guy, whether u LOVE ESET or LOVE Eset products, u r still retarded.
Love is something that should be reserved for things that can return the feeling, shithead.
if u had a woman u would realize that.
now go back to your keyboard and do some more LOVIN' to your software products.

and Jack_Bauer is a retard. he couldn't even come up with his own userid; what a dick.

Maybe Jack Bauer is playmate of gigabyte89 behind keyboard, no?

SAMI BAG PULA IN MATA SI INTOTI MORTI MATI DE TARAN PROST SI SAMI SUGA PULA TOT NEAMU TAU PROST CICAT DE NOD32 CE ESTI NOD32KIGSHIT AUZI REGELE NOD CICAT INPUTIT DUTEN PIZDA MATI DE SOBOLAN NU MEAI ZIS ANIMALULE DE UNDE ESTI TARANE NOD32KINGSHIT FACKING IDIOT SHIT STOP THE SHITWAR SI BOULE ZIMI DE UNDE ESTI ROMAN DE CICAT DACA ESTI ROMAN?????

Can someone explain to me what this guy is all about?
Who the hell is he talking to?
Does anyone know what language this is?
Is he talking about something interesting, or is he just ranting on about some unimportant stuff?

Man, whatever.

Kaspersky is the KING in the world!

nod32kingshit it.s facking tigan gypsy roman are u all mentally retarded

FIU DE CURVA,
Nu ma mai fute la cap!

I just think motanu & NOD32king is the same persons.. lol assholes!

poor guy, now everyone knows what u do in front of your keyboard u r angry?
i sorry for reveal u secret.

BA DA ANIMALULE AM SA TE FUT PE TINE SI PE MATA CIT VREA PULA MEA SI BOU INCALTAT CE ESTI NU VEZI CA TOTI ISI BAT PULA DE TINE SI DE MATA PE SITEUL ASTA AI AJUNS ULTINA GAINA ....ANIMALULE ..................TOTI ITI DA LA MUIE TIE SI LU MATA PE SAITU ASTA GASCANE..

Sugi pula si cu curu si cu gura.

Sa o fut pe mata moarta!!

ESTI O LABA TRISTA, MANCA MI AI CACATU!
FUTUS PIZDA MASI, SUGI PULA SI CU CURU SI CU GURA!!
FUTUI PIZDA MATI CAPAC FIU DE CURVA,
Nu ma mai fute la cap Sugi pula si cu curu si cu gura.Sa o fut pe mata moarta!!MUIE !!!!!!!!!! LACHE DE GARA CE ESTI AI BELIT PULA SI TU SI MATA AL MEU ESTI DEACUMA AM CU CINE MA DISTRA ADUO PE MATA SAI TRAG O CLANTA ADUO SA VADA SI EA CE ANIMAL AVORTAT A FACUT BAGATIAI PULA IN MATA SAMI BAG DE DOBITOC CE ESTI ...TE CAUT PESTE TOT CICATULE ...NU O SA MAI AI LINISTE PE SAITU ASTA SI BAGATI IN CUR CICATU ALA DE AVNOD32SHIT.MUIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

Dude, you are muy loco.
NO ONE UNDERSTANDS WHAT THE HELL YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, MAN!
It seems like you are mighty angry about something, but who the hell are you arguing with, buddy??!!

Can somebody help this guy?
He is flipping out!!

HEY dick face Am back I was focking your mother
her *** smells good ` gigabyte89 `
It`s people like NOD32King and my self ,that hate to see you assholes go on and on ; We know NOD32 is a greet AV software
but , we all don`t need to hear you wine adout it P.s Do you even know what puss smells like.

Wow... you're all very much so retards to even spend time on that. Leech some xxx, wank, sod off.

NOD32kacat, esti trist rau copile... sa-mi bag pula in ficata de nu!

i knew the stench from this pascal4 was familiar...

gypsy trash.

Holy crap I'm back. Hi Uagadugu, glad to see you've been putting morons in there place.

Yeah Anti-Malware, it's been a while since, i'm glad to see you here as well. Cheers mate :)

I see anti smart found his place. Among the best of known little pricks there ever was. You and uaga circle jerk eachother so much we cant tell you dipfuks apart.

What you and uaga get out of jail at the same time.

Nothings really changed here. Your a fuktard and NOD32 is still the best.

But kaspershit does seem to be slipping. Pretty bad to maybe you and uaga shoould head for the main lab and give those poor noobs a hand. Even shitheads like you could'nt fuk kaspershit any more then it already is.

Still stickin with the KING here.

NOD32

no wonder ant-smart is here.
when shit is around the dung beetles always come around hungry...

NOD32.
KING.

Regards,
FeatherGrass
Get Paid To Read Emails. Free To Join Now!
---------------------------------------------
http://www.emailcashpro.com/?r=FeatherGrass88
---------------------------------------------

No les hagais caso a Motanu y Nod32king, se ponen verdes uno a otro. Hablan rumano y seria mejor que el administrador no les dejara escribir mensajes en este forum.

botifarra el dumbass mas grande en el mundo!
Que carajo quieres?

Anda la puta que te pari!

NOD32 ES REY!!

Nod32king si no tienes otra cosa que decir, !callate! Que quiero yo es que te den por el culo. Chinga tu madre, cabron! Y aprenda mejor el castellano, pedazo de mierda!

botifarra tu heres una stupida y menca pendejo!
a noche me folle a tu madre por el ano cara de pito!
sacate a la chingada, chupaverga!

WTF r u talking the 2 stupid fag?

This is an english forum assholes!

after what dre360 said about yur mother i am surprise u still want more english?
u some masochist or sumting?

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6...

..But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately..

..The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses..

..What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

Noce bit of science fiction.

Your mommy write that for ya.

uagadugu= DIPSHIT!!

NOD32 Still the best after all these years.

yuht00, #2 and #5 use Kasperksy's engine. And considering Kaspersky has great self protection and removal rates with low false positives, the #1,#3,#4 all get thrown down a few places.

Kaspersky, Closer to perfection then any other AV.

PD1447, teetering on the line between retard and insane.

Another unsurprising factually selective post by Aunty.
"#2 and #5 use Kasperksy's engine" + "and others" is a complete statement.

AS*SH*OLES GOTTA LEARN SOMETIME -POOR DUMMY PERFECTDUMB- MUAHAHAHAHA

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6. But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately.
The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses.
What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

Another post proving nothing by axfleming. Your just kind of here. Go home.

FACT: Kaspersky Is King.
FICTION: NOD32 is an AV that can be used at thousands of home computers and keep half of them safe.

AS*SH*OLES GOTTA LEARN SOMETIME -POOR DUMMY PERFECTDUMB- MUAHAHAHAHA

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6. But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately.
The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses.
What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

The behavior of Kaspersky is an advantage for mentally impaired such as uagadugu.
Since they release 3 betas PER WEEK as opposed to two or three per release like other developers who can code, there is like 50 different threads to watch instead of one like ESET.

HOW MANY OTHER DEVELOPERS HAVE TWO SIMULTANEOUS BETAS OF DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF THE SAME SOFTWARE??!

Windows XP Beta v5.12 with Windows Vista Beta v6.02, anyone?

NOD32.
When your data matters.

Axfleming, you're just jealous they fix the bugs in 1/15th of the time it takes for Eset and other companies to fix theirs.

There's a different dev team for V7 and V8 too. So V7 improves on technologies they already have, and V8 tries out the new stuff.

Your trying to find flaws in good things. And you fail.

Well, if they have 15 times the bugs, maybe they need to try to fix them in 1/15th of the time just to keep up....
Maybe that explains why they need 15 times as much betas....

Damn bugs.....

http://www.av-comparatives.org/seiten/ergebnisse_2007_11.php

Read it and weep uaga you fuking prick. And you to anti smart.

Kaspershit it the big loser(like the two of you)!!

And!

NOD32 reigns as the one true king!!

YEAH KASPERSKY GOT ADVANCED+ ...WHAT ABOUT IT? IT'S ALREADY KNOWN THAT KASPERSKY IS KING -YOU RETARDED HAHAHAHA

WANNA REAL NEWS?
I'M REALLY GLAD TO GIVE YA ANOTHER EXCLUSIVE -KINDLY DEDICATED TO THE PAIR OF DUMBASSES CLOWNS: PERFECTDUMB & AXFLEMINASSHOLE:

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

Looks like uaga has taken to acctually making shit up to try and cover up how bad kaspershit really sucks.

The rating says it all dipshit. Sure kaspershit got adv+(why I cant tell). But fond less treats the NOD32 and had more false positives.

Keep making up your little stories though. Maybe one day you can write childrens books.

But your so far off the real facts you'll never be taken seriously.

NOD32 The Winner of the Nov Av comparatives.

IS YOUR GOD!

dipshit..

In law enforcement the detective is the one that finds the crook's hideout and then they send in a bunch of guys to go in and get them.
Those guys get dirty, pushing the suspect on the ground and doing the cuffing, while the detective stands out of the way so that his suit stays clean.
kaspershit is the nobody cop and NOD32 is the Chief Detective, u stupid retard.
kaspershit sacrifice detection rate so that it can clean better.
I will take the superior detection anyday over cleaning, because, retard, it is better to not need to clean up at all!

NOD32 is KING!!

Unfortunately PD1447, I have to make the same point over and over and over... This is a pro-active, heuristic detections test... No signatures..

NOD32 has great heuristics, thats great it detected more then Kaspersky on what 2500 samples? Without signatures

The on-demand test has over 500,000 samples with signatures, meaning the difference in % MEANS something. This is an Overall Detection test, while the other is more of a "Oh I don't update my AV" test. If you don't update your AV, you deserve to get infected either way.

Plus Andreas / IBK who runs the tests... Has stated MANY times to look at the certificate and not the % on this test.

Kaspersky Advanced +
NOD32 Advanced +

Oh so the heuristics are close, and the % reveals NOD32's are a little better.

That's great.

Only Overall Detection is where it matters, February 2008, is where its at.

Andreas can tell you how to interpret the numbers any way he feels like: all he does is run test and collect data.

I look at the numbers for myself.

Anti-Smart, you keep touting signature-based analysis; why is the entire AV industry moving to HIPS and other behavior-based analysis methods?

Because the black-list concept is proving to be inherently FLAWED.

It is completely dependent companies having access to the malware before it gets to the user.

Behavior-Analysis is the future, and the excellent heuristics in NOD32 today is a preview of that future.


NOD32: IS YOUR AV READY FOR THE FUTURE?

Anti malware(smart). You have been waiting for one thing after another that will prove kaspershit is better then NOD32.

But you never get it do ya.

Your the ugly chick at the prom who never gets asked to dance. Maybe next dance. But your the ugly girl that nobody will come near.

So sad.

AS*SH*OLES GOTTA LEARN SOMETIME -POOR DUMMY PERFECTDUMB- MUAHAHAHAHA

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6. But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately.
The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses.
What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

well if search in google for "Alexander Dimitru" u can't find anything. are u sure he exist and is the security expert?

oh!!! i get it, the security guard look after the building. isn't it?

His name was changed on purpose -search for alexandru dumitru-

KASPERSKY IS KING

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

 

Kaspershit just failed the December VB100 tests!!

 

That means that of the last five tests, Kaspershit failed twice!

And guess who is five for five??!

 

Stop being stupid, Kaspershit retards; trade up to the only King!

 

thanks for the heads-up, gigabyte89!

 

NOD32 IS KING!

The latest AV-Comparatives prove Kaspersky superior once again to nodCRAP. Perfectdumb and nod32CRAP will rant and rave, but the facts remain.

Kaspersky Is and always will be the best.

KASPERSKY IS KING

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

Uhhhmmm..uagadugu.

I'm sorry.

We already know the real results of those test.

Sorry.

Kaspershit failed.

HERE U ARE MORON -RE-TESTED-

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

Above link from wilders security forum ;)

KASPERSKY IS KING

nodCRAP TRASHED!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kaspersky is like having a thousand virus kicking Ninjas inside your pc - you don't know they're there, but they are !!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

If u cant provide the link to your source... dun say nothing! ESET rulz \o/

it seems u are as retarded as PERFECTDUMB and her nodCRAP...... 9down clears any link posted here from their blacklisted sites. search it for yourself u retarded

KASPERSKY IS KING

HERE U ARE MORON -RE-TESTED-

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS 7.0's PROACTIVE PROTECTION ACHIEVES THE HIGHEST CERTIFICATION IN THE LATEST AV-COMPARATIVES TESTS

Kaspersky Lab, a leading developer of secure content management solutions, announces that Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 has demonstrated the highest level of reliability and effectiveness of its proactive protection system in a series of tests conducted by AV-Comparatives.org, a respected Austrian antivirus lab. Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus was awarded the highest certification: Advanced+.

“New malicious programs and viruses appear every day and it is evident that antivirus database updates, even hourly, are not enough to provide users with reliable protection from possible Internet threats. There is always a time “gap” between the appearance of a new threat and the release of an update. So to provide effective antivirus protection it is important to effectively detect new threats,” says the head of the AV-Comparatives lab Andreas Clementy.

AV-Comparatives conducted a series of tests in order to compare the effectiveness of various antivirus solutions' on-demand detection of malicious programs (by the program scanner). This method makes it possible to estimate the effectiveness of the heuristic analyzer, one of the components of the proactive protection system. The testing included 17 antivirus products for home users with antivirus databases that were dated August 5, 2007. The sample of malicious programs used in the tests appeared after this date.

Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 was awarded the highest certification—Advanced+, which confirms the program has the highest level of detection of new malicious programs with minimal false positives using the antivirus program's heuristic analyzer. It should be noted that only 1 other products tested was awarded this certification.

“Kaspersky Lab developed and introduced a new heuristic analyzer in it's version 7.0 home user products in the summer of this year. In June 2007 this new module first participated in AV-Comparatives' testing and immediately received the Advanced+ certificate,” says Deputy Director of the Innovation Technologies Nikolay Grebennikov. “This is a long-awaited and very significant assessment of Kaspersky Lab’s work.”

The heuristic analyzer is only one of the components of the proactive protection module included in Kaspersky Lab products. Contrary to most competitors’ products, Kaspersky Lab products provide additional protection: a behavior blocker, which blocks the activity of malicious programs based on their behavior. The effectiveness of this module was also tested by AV-Comparatives in June 2007, with the test developers commenting: “The results of the tests performed with the randomly chosen malicious programs have confirmed the highest protection level and the effectiveness of the behavior blocker, which is awarded the Proactive Protection Award of the AV-Comparatives test laboratory.”

To find out more about the report “Comparison of different malware protection technologies”, or for more information about the Proactive Protection Award, please visit AV-Comparatives.org

http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575587

KASPERSKY IS KING

Uagadugu - seems that you are a moron :)
ESET NOD32 was perfect and didn't miss any single WildList file. The "missed one" was due to fault test set:
http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2007/12_12.xml
The kaspersky was the program that failed, because of wrong default settings.

nodCRAP...TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

HERE U ARE MORON -RE-TESTED-

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS 7.0's PROACTIVE PROTECTION ACHIEVES THE HIGHEST CERTIFICATION IN THE LATEST AV-COMPARATIVES TESTS

Kaspersky Lab, a leading developer of secure content management solutions, announces that Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 has demonstrated the highest level of reliability and effectiveness of its proactive protection system in a series of tests conducted by AV-Comparatives.org, a respected Austrian antivirus lab. Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus was awarded the highest certification: Advanced+.

“New malicious programs and viruses appear every day and it is evident that antivirus database updates, even hourly, are not enough to provide users with reliable protection from possible Internet threats. There is always a time “gap” between the appearance of a new threat and the release of an update. So to provide effective antivirus protection it is important to effectively detect new threats,” says the head of the AV-Comparatives lab Andreas Clementy.

AV-Comparatives conducted a series of tests in order to compare the effectiveness of various antivirus solutions' on-demand detection of malicious programs (by the program scanner). This method makes it possible to estimate the effectiveness of the heuristic analyzer, one of the components of the proactive protection system. The testing included 17 antivirus products for home users with antivirus databases that were dated August 5, 2007. The sample of malicious programs used in the tests appeared after this date.

Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 was awarded the highest certification—Advanced+, which confirms the program has the highest level of detection of new malicious programs with minimal false positives using the antivirus program's heuristic analyzer. It should be noted that only 1 other products tested was awarded this certification.

“Kaspersky Lab developed and introduced a new heuristic analyzer in it's version 7.0 home user products in the summer of this year. In June 2007 this new module first participated in AV-Comparatives' testing and immediately received the Advanced+ certificate,” says Deputy Director of the Innovation Technologies Nikolay Grebennikov. “This is a long-awaited and very significant assessment of Kaspersky Lab’s work.”

The heuristic analyzer is only one of the components of the proactive protection module included in Kaspersky Lab products. Contrary to most competitors’ products, Kaspersky Lab products provide additional protection: a behavior blocker, which blocks the activity of malicious programs based on their behavior. The effectiveness of this module was also tested by AV-Comparatives in June 2007, with the test developers commenting: “The results of the tests performed with the randomly chosen malicious programs have confirmed the highest protection level and the effectiveness of the behavior blocker, which is awarded the Proactive Protection Award of the AV-Comparatives test laboratory.”

To find out more about the report “Comparison of different malware protection technologies”, or for more information about the Proactive Protection Award, please visit AV-Comparatives.org

http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575587

KASPERSKY IS KING

Re-tested? By Who?? You!!???

Your an idiot uagadugu.

You tested!!?? Thats the cutest thing I have ever heard.

You have no detectable inteligence.

You "belive" kaspershit is better?

More proof your a doof.

Your posting are lies that you didnt have the smarts to even make yourself.

Who did edit all that crap you pasted? Your mom?

NOD32 is the absolute best!

Get use to it!!

nodCRAP...TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

HERE U ARE MORON -RE-TESTED-

Test history

December 2007 - nodCRAP

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: December 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP on Windows 2000


June 2007 - nodCRAP 2.7

Status: FAIL
Failure reason: 1 wildlist misses
Product name: nodCRAP
More: June 2007 in full
Review: nodCRAP 2.7 on Windows XP

KASPERSKY IS KING

"The overall winner product (best antivirus) of 2007 is NOD32"  -  AV-Comparatives

 

 

 

From the Weblog of AV-Comparatives

 

December 17th, 2007

HERE'S UR FAVORITE nodcrapGAY:

nodCRAP...TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

uagadugu, AV-Comparatives test-bed consists of viruses and a cross section of other malware, while av-test uses mainly backdoors/trojans/spyware but does not include viruses, you stupid retard.

AS*SH*OLES GOTTA LEARN SOMETIME -POOR DUMMY PERFECTDUMB- MUAHAHAHAHA

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6. But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately.
The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses.
What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS 7.0's PROACTIVE PROTECTION ACHIEVES THE HIGHEST CERTIFICATION IN THE LATEST AV-COMPARATIVES TESTS

Kaspersky Lab, a leading developer of secure content management solutions, announces that Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 has demonstrated the highest level of reliability and effectiveness of its proactive protection system in a series of tests conducted by AV-Comparatives.org, a respected Austrian antivirus lab. Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus was awarded the highest certification: Advanced+.

“New malicious programs and viruses appear every day and it is evident that antivirus database updates, even hourly, are not enough to provide users with reliable protection from possible Internet threats. There is always a time “gap” between the appearance of a new threat and the release of an update. So to provide effective antivirus protection it is important to effectively detect new threats,” says the head of the AV-Comparatives lab Andreas Clementy.

AV-Comparatives conducted a series of tests in order to compare the effectiveness of various antivirus solutions' on-demand detection of malicious programs (by the program scanner). This method makes it possible to estimate the effectiveness of the heuristic analyzer, one of the components of the proactive protection system. The testing included 17 antivirus products for home users with antivirus databases that were dated August 5, 2007. The sample of malicious programs used in the tests appeared after this date.

Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 was awarded the highest certification—Advanced+, which confirms the program has the highest level of detection of new malicious programs with minimal false positives using the antivirus program's heuristic analyzer. It should be noted that only 1 other products tested was awarded this certification.

“Kaspersky Lab developed and introduced a new heuristic analyzer in it's version 7.0 home user products in the summer of this year. In June 2007 this new module first participated in AV-Comparatives' testing and immediately received the Advanced+ certificate,” says Deputy Director of the Innovation Technologies Nikolay Grebennikov. “This is a long-awaited and very significant assessment of Kaspersky Lab’s work.”

The heuristic analyzer is only one of the components of the proactive protection module included in Kaspersky Lab products. Contrary to most competitors’ products, Kaspersky Lab products provide additional protection: a behavior blocker, which blocks the activity of malicious programs based on their behavior. The effectiveness of this module was also tested by AV-Comparatives in June 2007, with the test developers commenting: “The results of the tests performed with the randomly chosen malicious programs have confirmed the highest protection level and the effectiveness of the behavior blocker, which is awarded the Proactive Protection Award of the AV-Comparatives test laboratory.”

To find out more about the report “Comparison of different malware protection technologies”, or for more information about the Proactive Protection Award, please visit AV-Comparatives.org

http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575587

KASPERSKY IS KING

Uagadugu, you ignoramus, who cares if Av-Comparatives say Kaspershit won one award during the year when they also say that
NOD32 IS ANTIVIRUS OF THE YEAR?!

you are truly a stupid retard.

JUST TO CLARIFY THINGS:

nodCRAP...TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

Only peices of shit like uagadipshit use kaspershit.

Their really stupid fuks to. Thick foreheads.

Their incapable of ever learning anything no matter how many times they are shown. They never learn from their mistakes.

Their just too fukin stupid.

WANNA MORE? HERE U ARE:

Goodbye nodCRAP; Hello Kaspersky!!!

Published July 12th, 2007 in Corporate Talk

"Eset's nodCRAP has long been our favorite anti-virus program at NeoSmart Technologies.
In recent years (mainly from last year though), nodCRAP has fallen WAY BEHIND in the detection rankings, but for the most part had remained a decent choice. Virus.gr has the latest testing results as summed up in this post at CyberNet News. In the latest round of tests (and the one before that, and the one before that) Kaspersky is yet again at the top, with a 99.23% detection rate for the newly-released version 7 and a 99.13% for version 6. But all changed with the release of Kaspersky 7. In a test run, we found 3 different trojans on our machines (for a total of 6 infected files) that nodCRAP hadn't detected (even with heuristics enabled and set to the highest level) which Kaspersky picked up immediately.
The real kicker wasn't the fact that nodCRAP missed a trojan, it was the fact that 2 of these trojans have been listed in the Kaspersky virus signature database since mid-2006, and that when reporting such missed trojans the nodCRAP team replies in a mostly arrogant manner.
Looking at this thread where a nodCRAP user reported to their tech support that several common trojans ((One of which was found in our test run here at NeoSmart Technologies)) weren't picked up by nodCRAP but were by Kasperksy, the replies by nodCRAP moderators are quite shocking. They start off by claiming that the original poster's title is misleading purposely accusatory (which it isn't, objectively speaking) and this later escalates (when a new poster claims to have a list of 21 trojans nodCRAP failed to detect) into accusations of virus-harvesting and purposely looking for nodCRAP's weaknesses.
What should have been a simple "thank you for your observations and our apologies for the inconvenience" became a highly-ridiculous "nodCRAP can do no wrong" thread. We've been recommending nodCRAP since the start, but to us it is clear that this is where we part paths. If a company makes a mistake an oversight of a single trojan, that we can live with. But when moderators on their forum insist on turning it into a personal attack against anyone that has any issues with nodCRAP, it's sign that something very wrong is underfoot.
So, goodbye nodCRAP, you've served us average throughout the years (as previous threads and articles will testify). But it's time for a new AV that continues to improve and without taking offense to simple mistakes. Unfortunately, pride and failure often to lead to one and the same thing - and if there's a better alternative, we'd be fools not to take it."
-neosmart.net-

KASPERSKY IS KING

JUST TO CLARIFY THINGS:

nodCRAP...TOTAL CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LATEST AV-TEST.ORG TEST -THE MOST RELIABLE ANTIVIRUS TESTS RESOURCE-

Date: 23.11.2007

1 WebWasher 1.055.594 99,45%
2 G-Data AVK 2008 1.053.500 99,26%
3 Bitdefender 1.041.180 98,10%
4 AntiVir 1.040.413 98,02%
5 F-Secure 1.039.877 97,97%
6 Kaspersky 1.034.743 97,49%
7 Symantec 1.020.876 96,18%
8 Microsoft 1.018.993 96,01%
9 Trend Micro 1.013.452 95,48%
10 Ikarus 1.013.183 95,46%
11 Avast! 1010829 95,24%
12 AVG 1009407 95,10%
13 Sophos 1008605 95,03%
14 NodCRAP 994015 93,65%

RATING SAYS IT ALL!!!

KASPERSKY IS KING

Why Kaspersky IS Better Than nodCRAP - Here’s another reason!

By: Alexander Dimitru, Security Expert

"You can’t always tell which is the best anti-virus for your machine, as all the vendors will claim they deliver top-notch solutions, that they are leaders on the market and all that. Also, you often get facts stating that in some test a certain anti-virus ranked first, but they rarely state what competition they had. In any case, in view of recent events, Kaspersky beats the crap out of nodCRAP; and I will give you some facts and explain why it is so.

A computer with nodCRAP and Windows XP SP2 had been infected by several Trojans. The AV found two of them and no matter how many times you would delete them, they would still pop up after rebooting. nodCRAP could not disinfect the files, it just deleted them. That was pretty nasty. Couldn’t get rid of the threats! Cmd didn’t help much either – I guess they were stuck in the Recycler or something. Now, what I advised the owner of the affected machine was to run other AV solutions… however, none of the free ones seemed to do better than nodCRAP, fact which was to be expected. Then she asked me what else could she buy, so I advised her to get Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0. The minute it had been installed it asked for an update and a full system scan. It took Kaspersky about 2 hours to scan a 70% full 160GB hard drive, but it found 8 threats and eliminated them all. I then rebooted the machine and scanned the folders where the viruses had been discovered – now it was all clean. So, based on this experience, I would definitely go with Kaspersky, rather than nodCRAP.

To us users, it’s these things that count. It doesn’t matter what tests and magazines say – when you’re facing a threat and your AV doesn’t help you enough, then you deem it useless. Users don't care what other threats it may destroy – they want to get rid of the ones THEY'RE facing! Furthermore, after this happening, I definitely became a Kaspersky fan. I, for one, don’t care how much resource it will eat up – at least I will stay protected. What’s the use of having security software that will not "stress" your machine, if it’s also ineffective against viruses?"

KASPERSKY IS KING

KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS 7.0's PROACTIVE PROTECTION ACHIEVES THE HIGHEST CERTIFICATION IN THE LATEST AV-COMPARATIVES TESTS

Kaspersky Lab, a leading developer of secure content management solutions, announces that Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 has demonstrated the highest level of reliability and effectiveness of its proactive protection system in a series of tests conducted by AV-Comparatives.org, a respected Austrian antivirus lab. Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus was awarded the highest certification: Advanced+.

“New malicious programs and viruses appear every day and it is evident that antivirus database updates, even hourly, are not enough to provide users with reliable protection from possible Internet threats. There is always a time “gap” between the appearance of a new threat and the release of an update. So to provide effective antivirus protection it is important to effectively detect new threats,” says the head of the AV-Comparatives lab Andreas Clementy.

AV-Comparatives conducted a series of tests in order to compare the effectiveness of various antivirus solutions' on-demand detection of malicious programs (by the program scanner). This method makes it possible to estimate the effectiveness of the heuristic analyzer, one of the components of the proactive protection system. The testing included 17 antivirus products for home users with antivirus databases that were dated August 5, 2007. The sample of malicious programs used in the tests appeared after this date.

Based on the results, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 was awarded the highest certification—Advanced+, which confirms the program has the highest level of detection of new malicious programs with minimal false positives using the antivirus program's heuristic analyzer. It should be noted that only 1 other products tested was awarded this certification.

“Kaspersky Lab developed and introduced a new heuristic analyzer in it's version 7.0 home user products in the summer of this year. In June 2007 this new module first participated in AV-Comparatives' testing and immediately received the Advanced+ certificate,” says Deputy Director of the Innovation Technologies Nikolay Grebennikov. “This is a long-awaited and very significant assessment of Kaspersky Lab’s work.”

The heuristic analyzer is only one of the components of the proactive protection module included in Kaspersky Lab products. Contrary to most competitors’ products, Kaspersky Lab products provide additional protection: a behavior blocker, which blocks the activity of malicious programs based on their behavior. The effectiveness of this module was also tested by AV-Comparatives in June 2007, with the test developers commenting: “The results of the tests performed with the randomly chosen malicious programs have confirmed the highest protection level and the effectiveness of the behavior blocker, which is awarded the Proactive Protection Award of the AV-Comparatives test laboratory.”

To find out more about the report “Comparison of different malware protection technologies”, or for more information about the Proactive Protection Award, please visit AV-Comparatives.org

http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575587

KASPERSKY IS KING

Watcha saying eh u nodCRAPGAY???

German magazine PC Praxis has announced Kaspersky Internet Security “Product of the Year”

Kaspersky Lab, a leading developer of secure content management solutions, announces that the readers of the German magazine PC Praxis have named Kaspersky Internet Security “The Product of the Year” under the category of “IT security”
More than 35 thousand PC Praxis readers participated in the open voting. It should be noted that this year Kaspersky Internet Security, a solution that provides integrated protection for PCs, has bypassed its main competitors on the German market - Symantec and McAfee solutions.

“For us the awards following the results of the readers’ voting is the best response from the users”, says Andreas Lamm, Managing Director of Kaspersky Lab in Germany. “In that way we learn that the users are really satisfied with our products. Of course we are striving for leadership on consumer market and it is only possible if the clients highly appreciate Kaspersky Lab products”

Kaspersky Internet Security 7.0 is an antivirus software that protects PCs from viruses and other types of malicious programs, hacker attacks and spam. The solution provides users with convenient and secure operations when connected to the Internet.

PC Praxis is an authoritative German weekly magazine for advanced users and IT professionals. And has a circulation of about 150 thousand.

http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=207575601

KASPERSKY IS KING