Posted by Goofy 556 Day ago, There are 19 comments, 18564 views
|
FlashGet is a leading download manager and has the highest amount of users on the internet. It uses MHT(Multi-server Hyper-threading Transportation) technique, supports various protocols and has excellent document management features. FlashGet is a freeware without any adware or spyware. FlashGet Version 1.8.4 (2007.05.16)
+Added exceptions report: exceptions report will be prompt to send to debugrpt{at}flashget.com
+Improved search toolbar
+Support eMule/ed2k
*Changed version format: MainVersion.MinorVersion.PatchVersion.ReleaseTimes
*Fixed some minor UI bugs
|
| Like this story?Spread the news by clicking below: |
Add to:      |
Score: (38 ratings) |
Rating it: |
There are 19 additional comments
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
asif2bd on 2007-05-16 23:12:29
U rocks.
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
fuhayer on 2007-05-16 23:17:53
i used Flashget for years but regret to tell that new versions of 1.84 are really crap. i have tried Orbitdownloader and regret to tell that orbit is much much better/FASTER than flashget.
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
fuhayer on 2007-05-16 23:18:50
FlashGet's classic versions are working more stable than new 1.8xx versions.
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
paulik on 2007-05-16 23:21:58
idm is the best of the best
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
wadpro on 2007-05-16 23:27:37
Newer versions of flashget are very bad!
Orbit is better and free.
RE : by
waldo on 2007-05-16 23:53:51
I have to agree, Orbit seems to work better.
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
gigatue on 2007-05-16 23:41:36
Orbit is better
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
cityman on 2007-05-16 23:59:54
i am using 1.72 and it is fine; works well with firefox. don't forget firefox needs an add-on called flashgot.
no complaints- i like it
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
Miroglu on 2007-05-17 00:00:17
Thanks..
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
darksavior on 2007-05-17 05:03:46
why does flashget need a patch? it's free
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
Cibic on 2007-05-17 05:43:35
It's for modifying the default download limitation (from 10 to 30 parts) and download jobs (from 8 to 100) if I'm not mistaken
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
cyberloner on 2007-05-17 06:22:41
flashget for a long time too... move to orbit
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
nagaleo on 2007-05-17 08:36:00
I just download this software and try to use it. From the comment,i hope this program can help me for easy download.
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
Rickysay on 2007-05-17 09:49:58
damn after all this time stucked in the cave, i gotta try orbit out myself
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
tuxSticky on 2007-05-17 19:45:06
Thanks you, but i think i`ll try out the Orbit.
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
djcenox on 2007-05-17 20:42:56
orbit sucks with rapidshare premium.
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
patrickdrd on 2007-05-18 04:01:56
I'll stick to fg 1.73,
"if it works, don't fix it!",
so... no, no, I won't take!
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
Keat on 2007-05-18 15:17:25
I've using flashget! but everyone seems prefer orbit. I'm gonna try orbit as well!
RE:FlashGet 1.84 by
phantung83 on 2007-05-24 19:39:13
I agree with all of u that Orbit is fast. But Orbit could support more protocol than FlashGet.
Furthermore, in many sites, Orbit cannot download although it catch files
Rss Feed
