Thank you. Great post.

Patience friend - you will be upgrading before then.  If not, and you’ve got some, use money. 
This thing is the only one worth a $pend.

My personal think this software take too much ram.

I also think it takes up way too much ram and it slows pc down when scanning.

Kspersky found a virus that others antivirus dont found.

This is the best AVP out. IMHO It stops and deletes viruses that others like Norton can't do anything about. As far as too much ram and slows you down. What are you talking about. It only has one running process that takes up about 10k.

Thanks 9down

bleh, norton. I prefer NOD32, but might as well give this a try again.

Check the difference between how NOD and KAV handle Archives - You will be sold.  And don't cut any corners when you do the changeover.  You will end up like those other poor devils that always blame in ignorance.

ok i don't know what version i had, but this is nothing near it. Seems nice, maybe it will be my new av? Thanks

Check the difference between how NOD and KAV handle Archives - You will be sold.  And don't cut any corners when you do the changeover.  You will end up like those other poor devils that always blame in ignorance.

Nod32 Ruls!!!!!!!!!
The Best That Computer Can Get

Please stay with NOD. It is good (for some people).
But sorry, you deserve each other.

I'm a new user here , i just download this  Kaspersky Anti-Virus Personal 5.0.388 + Key install into my PC , Could anyone please so me how to regist . Thanks for advance .

I hope your machine is CLEAN before you start.

Always thoroughly, thoroughly, thoroughly, clear your system of all traces of your old (borrowed) KAV, or particularly any other AV, or, start a clean build of your whole system. A couple of House Calls may be an advantage for some people. For those who do not understand (OR READ THIS), it is their loss.

I hope your machine is CLEAN before you start.

Always thoroughly, thoroughly, thoroughly, clear your system of all traces of your old (borrowed) KAV, or particularly any other AV, or, start a clean build of your whole system. A couple of House Calls may be an advantage for some people. For those who do not understand (OR READ THIS), it is their loss.

Now AV - Kaspersky , what to say In my first test earlyer I was testing personal (non pro ver. 5.0.149) and that was good AV , not bad not best especially because lack of any serious config. which is not case with pro in contrary and especially iChecker™ technology which I dont saw in non pro ver. or it is not work properly then and that is the key feature in pro ver. because speed is very important to me. First annoying thing in pro ver. is insist on full scan which I dont wanna to do , 1 hour for drive C: is pretty much but 10 min. or less after that is outstanding (1 hour again in non pro ver.) , of course iChecker work great on pro 5.0.383 ver. now , NOD32 give me half hour or less for drive C: (system drive with program files and everything which is active is here). Now real-time performance is great if iChecker work right , if not , then being on line (or...) will be real pain because 1 hour of first on demand is very significant in relation with real-time engine which cant be so different here besides that my win. task manager say to me kav.exe 1,684k and kavsvc.exe 27.004k with all feature on highest and with redundand database (my vnc was detected but with proper explanation it can be a riskware) nod32 give me this number nod32kui.exe 2,506k and nod32krn.exe 18,036k with all on like KAV (after 10 min. of doing nothing on windows , now this is not exact number and can be less or higher depend of situation on both AV especially on KAV where is that amplitude higher then on nod32).

Conclusion

Only one day with KAV is not nearly enough , and I will have to do complete scan because on 3rd on demand he give me 45 min. again on C: with iChecker on . Much higher amplitude of ram usage on KAV than on NOD32 can be result of database checking or somethig else which I dont know , in my case this produce slightly twiching of my system in few cases. Redundant database is too much for me and some of features is not necessary especially some of network features who is FW like. Pass checking of archive is great also like 900 types of archive disinfects feature (NOD32 haveing problems with archive disinfecting as I´ve saw) , than again NOD32 is very smooth and still faster (but I have yet to see this like I said earlyer "only one day...")

Sorry for bad english.

On the settings tab click config real-time. On real-time config page there are more options to be had by clicking "real-time protection settings" at bottom of page. (ie: how long to scan) I find the start up scan rather lengthy myself. Was using ver.5.0.227 which preformed a little different but this one seems good once you get it set up to suit your needs.

Good advise tortus.

Translated, I understand what you are saying, and I can’t correct you on one single point. You are right on the button. NOD is undeniably much faster and lighter on the system than anything else out there – that’s any good, of course. No argument. Nothing is perfect though. What’s good for one may not suit everybody. Speaking for myself, to sacrifice some things which aren’t vital to the overall object of security and being able to walk away from the PC for and hour or so (occasionally) knowing that KAV has the option to do its job and shut the PC down on conclusion, seem pretty effortless to me. The efficiency and speed of how the dirt gets swept away is also undeniably in favour of KAV which should in my opinion be the priority of most – especially for the mass of ordinary everyday users.  However, this efficiency does not apply for those PCs (not especially the users) that are sailing a bit close to the wind. Sorry, I used to be an Old Salt.
I hope that many will be advantaged from our modest experience and fairly bias free discussion.
I have high praise for your FW but have not tried it with KAV. Let’s know after a few more days. I do know that, on a slowish box, that KAV and TINY (especially Pro) are a pathetic combination.  Individually, both are first class products (not perfect) but, together – no, no, no. OutPost really showed its worth with w9x, so in present times it’s a flyer. Anti-Hacker seems to be standing up OK with its surprisingly simple interface. The masses should love it, and of course, it combines well.